Amazon. Com (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) Could Miss Out On $10B JEDI

Amazon. Com (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) are at risk of losing out on the multi-billion JEDI cloud computing contract. Initially awarded to Microsoft in 2019, the $10 billion contract has been mired in litigation, with Amazon arguing it was wrongly awarded.

Amazon JEDI Defense

Amazon went to court disputing the awarding of the contract to Microsoft, alleging that then-president Donald Trump exerted pressure on the Pentagon to ensure it does not win. Trump has always been vocal against Amazon co-founder Jeff Bezos who he blames for unfavorable coverage of his administration.

A federal judge refusing to dismiss much of Amazon’s case has triggered a response for the defense department. Oracle Corp had also sued to block the JEDI contract ending up at Amazon on claims that an Amazon employee helped steer the procurement process in favor of the e-commerce giant.

The employee in question had worked for the Pentagon between 2016 and 217 before being hired by Amazon. The claims were thwarted by a court ruling which concluded the employee did not taint the program. A report by Pentagon Inspector also concluded that the pentagon adviser did not in any way violate ethical obligations.

JEDI Prospects

Deputy Defense secretary Kathleen Hicks has confirmed that the department will review the project in its entirety. The defense department has been forced to action amid growing concerns that a lengthy litigation process will jeopardize the program’s implementation. The JEDI program seeks to consolidate all the patchwork of data systems within the defense department.

Once implemented, it will accord defense personnel better access to real-time information while also putting the department on the front foot on emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence. The JEDI project has been mired in controversy from the onset, with lawmakers calling out the winner-take-all approach.

According to lawmakers, Pentagon should resort to a popular approach whereby multiple companies are allowed to bid for various project components. By spreading out the work to multiple companies, the agency would avoid unnecessary legal challenges that have so far derailed it.

By reading our website you agree to the terms of our disclaimer, which are subject to change at any time. Owners and affiliates are not registered or licensed in any jurisdiction whatsoever to provide financial advice or anything of an advisory nature. Always do your own research and/or consult with an investment professional before investing. Low priced stocks are speculative and carry a high degree of risk, so only invest what you can afford to lose. By using our service you agree not to hold us, our editor’s, owners, or staff liable for any damages, financial or otherwise, that may occur due to any action you may take based on the information contained within our newsletters, website, twitter, Facebook or chat. We do not advise any reader to take any specific action. Our releases are for informational and educational purposes only. Never invest purely based on our articles. Gains mentioned on our website, twitter, Facebook, and on our website may be based on EOD or intraday data. We may be compensated for the production, release, and awareness of this article. We will disclose any and all compensation on the article page. This publication and its owner never hold positions in the securities mentioned in our articles. Our information may contain Forward-Looking Statements, which are not guaranteed to materialize due to a variety of factors. We do not guarantee the timeliness, accuracy, or completeness of the information on our site. The information in our disclaimers is subject to change at any time without notice. We are not held liable or responsible for the information in press releases issued by the companies discussed in these write-ups. Please do your own due diligence