Joe Biden 2035 Carbon-Neutrality Ambitions Not Feasible

Rapid advances in nascent technologies such as batteries, lean times, and carbon capture would be needed if the U.S power industry is to meet Joe Biden’s carbon-neutral ambitions by 2035. However, the current situation raises serious doubt as to whether Biden’s ambitions are feasible.

Renewable Energy Tailwinds

The fact that technology designed to curb carbon emissions are still in the early stages of development raises serious doubts as to whether power producers would be able to reach the net-zero carbon emission any time soon.

In addition, current technologies are costly, which means very few power producers can deploy them on a commercial scale. The fact that the power producers are required to keep customer costs lows all but complicates the race for renewable energy.

The U.S power industry is hoping that scientific discovery in battery technology highly needed to store solar and wind energy will  help support a  transition from fossil fuels sooner than later. Currently, large batteries that can store renewable power are quite expensive.

In addition, power industry players are also hoping that the development of methods and technologies for capturing carbon emissions will help curtail global warming awaiting breakthroughs in the renewable energy segment.

Climate Change Concerns

The power industry has come under scrutiny in recent years by climate change activists on the fact that it accounts for nearly a third of total CO2 emissions. The sector is at par with the transportation sector, both of which are believed to be pumping more carbon into the atmosphere.

In recent years there have been calls for players in the power sector to invest in solar and wind power energy as a replacement to fossil fuels that continue to pile carbon emissions. While most companies have done so, a lack of a breakthrough in clean energy technology to enable mass adoption has made it impossible for mass adoption.

Biden, a climate change advocate, has always insisted on renewable energy sources as part of an effort of combating the global warming menace. In contrast, his rival in the Republican Party is a climate change skeptic who continues to support fossil fuel use.

By reading our website you agree to the terms of our disclaimer, which are subject to change at any time. Owners and affiliates are not registered or licensed in any jurisdiction whatsoever to provide financial advice or anything of an advisory nature. Always do your own research and/or consult with an investment professional before investing. Low priced stocks are speculative and carry a high degree of risk, so only invest what you can afford to lose. By using our service you agree not to hold us, our editor’s, owners, or staff liable for any damages, financial or otherwise, that may occur due to any action you may take based on the information contained within our newsletters, website, twitter, Facebook or chat. We do not advise any reader to take any specific action. Our releases are for informational and educational purposes only. Never invest purely based on our articles. Gains mentioned on our website, twitter, Facebook, and on our website may be based on EOD or intraday data. We may be compensated for the production, release, and awareness of this article. We will disclose any and all compensation on the article page. This publication and its owner never hold positions in the securities mentioned in our articles. Our information may contain Forward-Looking Statements, which are not guaranteed to materialize due to a variety of factors. We do not guarantee the timeliness, accuracy, or completeness of the information on our site. The information in our disclaimers is subject to change at any time without notice. We are not held liable or responsible for the information in press releases issued by the companies discussed in these write-ups. Please do your own due diligence